Task 2 Opinion essay — 5 đề luyện tập kèm bài mẫu

Đề bài: "Some people believe that homework is unnecessary and should be abolished. To what extent do you agree or disagree?"

The debate over whether homework should be eliminated from education has intensified in recent years. I partially disagree with this view, as I believe that a reasonable amount of homework remains beneficial for students.

Firstly, homework reinforces classroom learning by allowing students to practise and consolidate what they have been taught. Without regular revision, students may quickly forget key concepts. For instance, mathematics requires consistent practice to develop problem-solving skills, which cannot be achieved through classroom instruction alone.

However, I acknowledge that excessive homework can be counterproductive, leading to stress and burnout among students. The solution, therefore, lies not in abolishing homework entirely but in ensuring that assignments are meaningful and manageable. Teachers should focus on quality rather than quantity.

In conclusion, while homework in its current form may need reform, eliminating it altogether would deprive students of valuable opportunities for independent learning and self-discipline.

Đề bài: "Students should not be allowed to use smartphones in school. Do you agree or disagree?"

With smartphones becoming ubiquitous among young people, their presence in schools has become a contentious issue. I strongly agree that smartphones should be restricted in educational settings.

The most significant concern is that smartphones are a major source of distraction. Students who check social media or play games during lessons inevitably fall behind in their studies. A study in the UK found that schools which banned smartphones saw a 6% improvement in test scores, particularly among lower-performing students.

Admittedly, smartphones can serve as useful learning tools for research and educational applications. Nevertheless, schools can provide tablets or computers specifically configured for academic purposes, thereby eliminating the distractions associated with personal devices.

To sum up, restricting smartphone use in schools is necessary to maintain a focused learning environment. Schools should invest in dedicated devices for educational purposes instead.

Đề bài: "Governments should ban single-use plastic bags completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree?"

Plastic pollution has emerged as one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. I wholeheartedly agree that governments should impose a complete ban on single-use plastic bags.

The primary justification for a ban is the devastating impact of plastic waste on marine ecosystems. Approximately 8 million tonnes of plastic enter the oceans annually, killing marine animals and contaminating the food chain. A ban would dramatically reduce this figure and protect biodiversity.

While some argue that a ban would inconvenience consumers and increase costs, numerous countries have proven otherwise. Rwanda and Kenya have successfully implemented bans, with citizens quickly adapting to reusable alternatives. The short-term inconvenience is far outweighed by the long-term environmental benefits.

In conclusion, a complete ban on single-use plastic bags is both feasible and necessary. Governments should act decisively before the damage becomes irreversible.

Đề bài: "Physical education should be a compulsory subject at all levels of schooling. Do you agree or disagree?"

In an era of rising childhood obesity and sedentary lifestyles, the role of physical education in schools has become increasingly important. I fully agree that PE should be mandatory at every level of schooling.

Regular physical activity has been proven to enhance both physical and mental health. Students who exercise regularly demonstrate lower stress levels, improved concentration and better academic results. The World Health Organisation recommends at least 60 minutes of physical activity daily for children, and compulsory PE helps meet this target.

Some may contend that PE takes time away from academic subjects. However, research consistently shows that physical activity actually boosts cognitive function. Schools in Finland, where PE is compulsory and frequent, consistently rank among the top performers in international assessments.

All things considered, making physical education compulsory is essential for nurturing healthy, well-rounded individuals. Schools should view PE not as a luxury but as a fundamental component of education.

Đề bài: "Young people should take a gap year before starting university. To what extent do you agree or disagree?"

The concept of taking a year off between high school and university has gained popularity worldwide. While I see some merit in this idea, I believe that a gap year is not suitable for everyone and should remain a personal choice.

On one hand, a gap year can provide valuable life experiences. Travelling, volunteering or working allows young people to develop independence, broaden their perspectives and gain clarity about their career goals. Many students return to university with greater motivation and maturity.

On the other hand, a gap year carries risks, particularly for students from low-income families who may not have the financial resources for travel or unpaid internships. Furthermore, some students may lose academic momentum and find it difficult to return to a structured learning environment after a year of freedom.

In conclusion, while gap years can be beneficial, they should not be mandatory. Each student should carefully weigh the advantages and potential drawbacks based on their individual circumstances.